Home | About | Contact

 

Thickness measurement for Electrospun membrane

menchaca-campos2013.jpg
Cross-section of Ny/GO fibre film after three hours of electrospinning. [Menchaca-Campos et al. International Journal of Polymer Science, vol. 2013, Article ID 621618, 9 pages, 2013. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.]

In materials characterization and performance measurement, it is sometimes necessary to determine the thickness of the nanofiber membrane. However, high porosity of electrospun membrane made it partially compressible when it experiences a load. Thus, it is important to note that conventional thickness measurement equipment such as micrometer screw gauge may introduce a systematic error in the readings. Affandi et al (2010) measured the thickness of electrospun nanofibrous membrane (Polyacrylonitrile and Nylon) using a white light profilometer and a micrometer and compared the difference. As expected, the thickness measured using the white light profilometer is significantly larger than that measured from the micrometer. In some cases, the thickness measured by the micrometer is less than half that obtained from the profilometer with a difference of more than 10 µm. Further, the profilometer was able to measure the height compression due to the micrometer. Thus, where accuracy in thickness is essential, a contactless thickness measurement technique is preferred. Given the demand for determining the thickness of electrospun membrane, IME Technologies have developed a contactless thickness measuring module for measuring fiber membrane thickness during electrospinning. This device uses laser to accurately measure the thickness of the membrane as it builds up. See EM-TMM

Below is a list of some devices and methods that may be used to determine the membrane thickness of electrospun samples.

Measurement method Advantage Disadvantage Source / Supplier Remarks
Micrometer screw gauge Simple to use

Accurate down to 0.01 mm
Introduces systematic error due to membrane compression Mitutoyo, Product link Use glass coverslips between the measuring jaw to increase contact area to reduce compression
Cutting of membrane viewing of cross section under microscope Relatively simple

Accuracy dependent on microscope and positioning of membrane cross-section
Introduces random error due to membrane positioning    
Contactless laser measurement Simple to use

Thickness as low as 1 nm

Non-contact
Expensive (typically more than USD5000) Mitutoyo, Product link

Filmetrics, Product link

IME Technologies, EM-TMM
Check with supplier on the suitability of the product.
Ultrasonic technology Simple to use

From 10 um with accuracy in the single micron
Relatively expensive for higher resolution measurement

Require application of couplant

Require surface contact thus introduces systematic error.
DeFelsko, Product link Check with supplier on the suitability of the product.
Mitutoyo Litematic and Litematic Head - Series 318 Simple to use

Accurate down to 0.01 mm

Low contact force (0.01 N)
Expensive Mitutoyo, Product link Check with supplier on the suitability of the product.
Published date: 12 December 2013
Last updated: 19 Feb 2017

Comments
[+]


Google Ad.