Unlike solution electrospinning, melt electrospinning does not require expensive scrubbing process to remove solvent vapours in the production setup. However, a melt electrospinning setup needs to address three major issues, insulation of parts from the applied high voltage, productivity and melting of the polymer feed. To address these issues, we proposed a melt differential electrospinning (MD-ESP) method [Yang et al 2014] for ultrafine fiber preparation.
Fig 1. A schematic diagram of the melt differential electrospinning (inner-cone and out-cone nozzle). |
With the MD-ESP method, fibers with diameter smaller than one micrometer can be produced at a yield of 10-20g/h using a needleless nozzle. The process was described as follows: firstly the supplied polymer melt was distributed to the surface of umbellate (cone-like) nozzles, next the melt film covered uniformly over the umbellate circumferential surface. When the applied high voltage surpassed a critical value, self-organized multiple jets around the rim of the umbellate nozzle were ejected to the receiver plate. This process is given the name MD-ESP due to the melt flow dividing into tens of minor Taylor-cones as a result of their self-organization. A high voltage was applied directly to the collector instead of the needle or nozzle and this allows the separation of the heating system and electrodes. The design of MD-ESP spinning nozzle includes the inner-cone type and the outer- cone type [Li et al 2014a, 2014b] as shown in figure 1.
On this basis, a four-nozzle test machine was established. The basic parameters of four-nozzles test equipment is as the following:
Fig 2. The photo of the pilot prototype of polymer melt differential electrospinning device. |
Based on the principle of polymer MD-ESP, a prototype equipment of pilot line was also designed and operated. This machine can realize mass production of polymer nanofiber by melt electrospinning route. As shown in figure 2, the equipment includes nine components: a small twin screw extruder, a melt filter, a melt metering pump, a melt differential electrospinning box, air auxiliary equipment, suction device, a lapping machine, and rolling-coiling machine. The melt differential electrospinning (MD-ESP) process and resultant diagram were compared with that of solution electrospinning(S-ESP) in figure 3.
The parameters for the pilot line and its performance are as follows:
Fig 3. The spinning process of pilot line and the diagram comparison. |
Table 1 shows the material and process that have been used its corresponding average diameter.
Material | Process | Average diameter |
---|---|---|
PA6 | Outer-cone nozzle | 8.85 µm |
PET | Outer-cone nozzle | 6.37 µm |
PLA | Outer-cone nozzle | 1.61 µm |
PCL | Outer-cone nozzle | 1.35 µm |
PP | Inner-cone nozzle | 645 nm |
PLA(2002D)/PEG(200) | Inner-cone nozzle | 860 nm |
Reference